ACTION//RE-ACTION

TEAM PORTRAIT

VIDEO (by the team)

INTERVIEW
^{Click on the images to enlarge}
1. How do you define the main issues of your project in relation with the theme “Re-sourcing”? Re-sourcing thanks to nature, to social dynamics, to new materiality? In which way do you think your project can contribute to an ecological and/or social evolution? And in which way do you think your project can be called a “regenerative project”?
The core issue is the transformation of the rail line causing a rupture that damages cohesion, nature, and vitality. The RE-SOURCING strategy mobilizes: Nature: RE-NATURALIZATION restores ecological continuity and manages flood risks. Social Dynamics: RE-CONNECTION links human flows. New Materiality: RE-ACTIVATION transforms empty plots and buildings into civic grounds, driven by citizens and local materials. The project is regenerative by transforming the fracture into an "opportunity belt" through urban, ecological, and social renewal.

2. How did the issues of your design and the questions raised by the site mutation meet?
The project addresses the railway rupture not with a single fix, but with a coherent, ambitious, and open plan. The strength lies in this holistic vision. It acts as a platform for collaboration among stakeholders and citizens. This open approach allows the three strategies—RE-NATURALIZATION, RE-CONNECTION, and RE-ACTIVATION—to guide the transformation of the fractured area while remaining open to co-creation and in this way resilient to future changes.

PROJECT: