Team Representative: Iván Capdevila Castellanos (ES) – architect; Associate: Vicente Iborra Pallarés (ES) – architect
Contributors: José Antonio Grás Íñigo (ES), Simona Mirón (RO) – architects
PLAY studio, Plaza Calvo Sotelo 3 8A, 03001 Alicante – España
+34 965 923 392– email@example.com – playstudio.es
I. Capdevila Castellanos, S. Mirón, J. A. Grás Íñigo & V. Iborra Pallarés
Click on the images to enlarge
1. How did you form the team for the competition?
We (Iván Capdevila and Vicente Iborra) have been working together in our own architecture office since 2005. Nowadays we are principals in PLAYstudio, an architecture practice settled in Alicante since 2010. For this competition we tried to incorporate some talented young architects like Simona and José Antonio in our team. Both of them were students at the University of Alicante, where we are also lecturers.
2. How do you define the main issue of your project, and how did you answer on this session main topic: Adaptability through Self-Organization, Sharing and/or Project (Process)?
The brief of the competition in Stavanger was asking for a very complex topic. The participants had to present a proposal for the competition site, the study area but also for the conurbation, which implied a territorial reflection for the Forus area, placed in between the Stavanger, Sola and Sadnes Municipalities. We clearly proposed a “middle-out” process, which tries to set the basis for the creation of an urban innovation area, and the starting point of this process was the competition site. We defined it as a pilot plot where we could create a new hub for the whole study area. We proposed to use 4+1 architectonic strategies –Innovation Palaces, Supersurface, Plug-in Towers, Well-tempered environment and Post-Oil Structure– there, to implement the first step of this innovation area.
3. How did this issue and the questions raised by the site mutation meet?
As a result we proposed a new built environment on this plot where all the economic agents present, not only in Forus, but in the whole metropolitan area, could find its place in the near future. But these tasks to be developed in the new Forus Hub are just the beginning of the process. The main idea of the project is not to fix a final image but to give enough urban and architectonic tools to deal with the topic. We believe that we can learn about the results obtained in order to later on apply them both on the study area and on the conurbation, trying to create what we called the Innovation Axis.
4. Have you treated this issue previously? What were the reference projects that inspired yours?
Our proposal was clearly based on Urban Sustainability criteria, and this is a milestone in our architecture practice. We are directing the More Than Green project, a multimedia encyclopaedia of environmental, social, economic and cultural sustainability. Also our project to create the Forus Hub tried to learn both from radical projects proposed in the 1960’s by authors like Cedric Price, Archigram, Superstudio, Hans Hollein or Reyner Banham, but clearly alluded to the work developed by other contemporary authors like Ecosistema Urbano or Lacaton & Vassal.
5. Today –at the era of economic crisis and sustainability– the urban-architectural project should reconsider its production method in time; how did you integrate this issue in your project?
As we have stated before we really believe in the process as a powerful architectural tool. As F. Ascher stated in “Les nouveaux principes de l’urbanisme” (2004) this urban project should be developed in an uncertain context and be flexible enough to incorporate new inputs during its development; it must also finally incorporate both public and private stakeholders. These are the basic elements of this FORUS LABing.
6. Is it the first time you have been awarded a prize at Europan? How could this help you in your professional career?
This is our third first prize in Europan. We won this competition previously in Wien (Europan 7) and Stavanger (Europan 8). We really believe that this new first prize can consolidate our work in the Norwegian context. It is now almost 10 years since we have won our first prize there, so after all this time we know it pretty much better that the first time we visited Stavanger. We are really anxious to apply this knowledge in the development of this new project.